soft young mess

I am a soft young mess, screaming shards through painted green water. Let genius be vividly wasted, free and empty, (i'm) drugged (i'm) on blue


Reblogged from missolympian-deactivated2011082
dionthesocialist:

stfuhatemongers:

goodreasonnews:

missolympian:

My opinion on the Spectrum: According to liberals it’s acceptable to mesh transgender’s with homosexuals, and to look at all sexuality as a range;
Men attracted to men
Men attracted to both men & women
Men attracted to women
and many more. 
The problem is, when it comes to men being attracted to children, all of a sudden it’s unacceptable? Liberals are contradicting themselves. It just keeps getting sicker and sicker as the American Association of Psychiatry has already announced that it’s ‘perfectly natural’ and ‘healthy’ for men to have sex with boys. Another case we can look at, which I find particularly funny, are the left wing animal rights activists - when they arrested a man for having sex with his dog. How does that fit into the spectrum? I suppose he ‘raped’ his dog, but the man was proclaiming that he loved his dog, and that his dog loved him? I find it funny how liberal thinking just collapses inwards on itself.
You are a fucking bigot and there are entire fields of psychological study dedicated to fighting the kind of abusive world-view you endorse.
Allow me to educate your sorry ass: Children and animals do not have the autonomy to provide sound consent. Two adults of any gender (that is to say the gender with which they identify WHICH IS WHAT THEY ARE not as judged by what’s between their legs) can provide sound consent. It’s as simple as that.
I’m sorry your slow wit has trouble understanding the world and you choose to instead insult and outcast people who’s situations you have no understanding of or appreciation for, but luckily, you don’t have to understand it. People who are transgendered, people who are gender queer, homosexuals and bisexuals are not looking to you for your approval or your armchair analysis. All that’s required of you is your tolerance. You clearly have no understanding of sexuality issues, but you’re not being forced to live that life style so it’s OK. All that’s asked of you is to be fucking polite. Is that asking so much?
Also, you did a piss poor photoshop job of rearranging this image. My graphic design background got a little nauseous just looking at this mess.

Whoa! The Original poster is indeed a hatemonger. Luckily goodreasonnews knows how to handle it.


TLDR Sex is if you got a penis or a vagina. So, defined by chromosomes, male/female, defined by body parts. Gender’s the rest of it.

dionthesocialist:

stfuhatemongers:

goodreasonnews:

missolympian:

My opinion on the Spectrum: According to liberals it’s acceptable to mesh transgender’s with homosexuals, and to look at all sexuality as a range;

  • Men attracted to men
  • Men attracted to both men & women
  • Men attracted to women
  • and many more. 

The problem is, when it comes to men being attracted to children, all of a sudden it’s unacceptable? Liberals are contradicting themselves. 

It just keeps getting sicker and sicker as the American Association of Psychiatry has already announced that it’s ‘perfectly natural’ and ‘healthy’ for men to have sex with boys. 

Another case we can look at, which I find particularly funny, are the left wing animal rights activists - when they arrested a man for having sex with his dog. How does that fit into the spectrum? I suppose he ‘raped’ his dog, but the man was proclaiming that he loved his dog, and that his dog loved him? 

I find it funny how liberal thinking just collapses inwards on itself.

You are a fucking bigot and there are entire fields of psychological study dedicated to fighting the kind of abusive world-view you endorse.

Allow me to educate your sorry ass: Children and animals do not have the autonomy to provide sound consent. Two adults of any gender (that is to say the gender with which they identify WHICH IS WHAT THEY ARE not as judged by what’s between their legs) can provide sound consent. It’s as simple as that.

I’m sorry your slow wit has trouble understanding the world and you choose to instead insult and outcast people who’s situations you have no understanding of or appreciation for, but luckily, you don’t have to understand it. People who are transgendered, people who are gender queer, homosexuals and bisexuals are not looking to you for your approval or your armchair analysis. All that’s required of you is your tolerance. You clearly have no understanding of sexuality issues, but you’re not being forced to live that life style so it’s OK. All that’s asked of you is to be fucking polite. Is that asking so much?

Also, you did a piss poor photoshop job of rearranging this image. My graphic design background got a little nauseous just looking at this mess.

Whoa! The Original poster is indeed a hatemonger. Luckily goodreasonnews knows how to handle it.

TLDR Sex is if you got a penis or a vagina. So, defined by chromosomes, male/female, defined by body parts. Gender’s the rest of it.

Notes

  1. caeciliusestinhorto reblogged this from pteris
  2. yoctavias reblogged this from im-a-bitch and added:
    Not going to lie. This graphic confused me a little bit. The white NOT part goes with the white? And the black … goes...
  3. im-a-bitch reblogged this from inherhipstheresrevolutions
  4. idioticgenius reblogged this from relivethememories
  5. dageming reblogged this from tigersmilk
  6. coquettishhope reblogged this from timekiller-s
  7. timekiller-s reblogged this from rantingnraging and added:
    commentary Indeed. Bold emphasis is mine on a key point: Sexual relations between children and animals are NON...
  8. rantingnraging reblogged this from goodreasonnews and added:
    awesome commentary.
  9. avrilfreemanpwns reblogged this from the-requiem
  10. the-requiem reblogged this from false-catalyst and added:
    *looks at picture and description*
  11. softyoungmess reblogged this from dionthesocialist and added:
    TLDR Sex is if you got a penis or a vagina. So, defined by chromosomes, male/female, defined by body parts. Gender’s the...
  12. pierianspring reblogged this from dionthesocialist and added:
    Excellent points made above by goodreasonnews. I thought I’d add a perspective from my experience as a Psychology...
  13. amarantae reblogged this from girlishfeministi
  14. amodernmanifesto reblogged this from dionthesocialist
  15. dionthesocialist reblogged this from girlishfeministi
  16. false-catalyst reblogged this from entropicfever and added:
    Commentary. Ladies, gentleman, and everyone in between, this is what a bigot looks like.
  17. entropicfever reblogged this from fuckyeah-nerdery and added:
    This type of idiocy makes me weep for humanity.
  18. jjarichardson reblogged this from tigersmilk
  19. tigersmilk reblogged this from jjarichardson and added:
    Another case we can look at, which I find particularly funny, are the left wing animal rights activists - when they...
  20. jjarichardson reblogged this from goodreasonnews and added:
    There is nothing original or insightful about this hysterically bigoted stupidity.
  21. lesbianslovefish reblogged this from ghirahim
  22. divineirony reblogged this from goodreasonnews and added:
    This OP gives me the terrible impression of someone who has never read an argument against his position. How does the...
  23. sultryenigma reblogged this from snailshell and added:
    There’s 3 options… you’re attracted to boys, girls or both… that’s about it. What you were born with is what you got....